It is currently Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:42 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
New Article: Power Rankings (Final) 
Author Message
Stillers.com Team
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 5:46 pm
Posts: 582
Post New Article: Power Rankings (Final)
Power Rankings (Final) has been posted by Steel Haven at Stillers.com.


Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:40 am
Profile
Seasoned Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:57 pm
Posts: 145
Post Re: New Article: Power Rankings (Final)
i don't know if id call cassell a disappointment just yet considering what he had to work with. they did lose tony gonzales and dwayne bowe suspension during the season didn't help


Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:26 pm
Profile
Seasoned Veteran

Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:05 am
Posts: 216
Post Re: New Article: Power Rankings (Final)
I can't believe they say we are #11. We stunk up the joint for 5 games


Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:28 am
Profile
Practice Squad

Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 31
Post Re: New Article: Power Rankings (Final)
I was very surprised to see San Diego ranked #1 here. Although they were on fire going into the playoffs, you just knew Rivers and Turner would find a way to turn ice cold like they do every January.

I was also a bit surprised to see Dallas at #5. Another hot team that you knew was going to find a way to choke. Romo, like Rivers and Palmer have perfected the art of choking in meaningful games.

Of course, that was the way it played out in 2009 again... Yes, all is right with the world – except for the fact that the Stillers didn’t even make the playoffs. Still comforting nonetheless.

:roll:


Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:04 pm
Profile
Practice Squad

Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 31
Post Re: New Article: Power Rankings (Final)
rick723 wrote:
I can't believe they say we are #11. We stunk up the joint for 5 games


I agree. I think Stillers should have been ranked at least 2 or 3 spots lower considering they lost to Chicago, Kansas City, Cleveland, and Oakland. All teams under .500.

2009 potential = way higher than #11. Delivery = much, much lower.


Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:09 pm
Profile
Greenhorned Rookie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:05 am
Posts: 78
Post Re: New Article: Power Rankings (Final)
AZ Steel wrote:
they lost to Chicago, Kansas City, Cleveland, and Oakland


Then again, they beat three teams in the top 7 of this list:
Chargers
Vikings
Green Bay

The 4 teams below the Steelers(Falcons, Ravens, Jets, Texans) beat the top 7 twice combined:
Jets when the Colts gave them the game
Ravens beat the Chargers in the only legitimate win these 4 teams have.

So, one impressive victory for these 4 teams. The Jets did beat New England, but the Pats are far more close to being an afterthought than Super Bowl contenders.

Steelers at 11 is just about right.


Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:39 pm
Profile
Practice Squad

Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 31
Post Re: New Article: Power Rankings (Final)
Steel Tank,

Excellent point. I guess the losses to crappy, sub .500 teams have stayed with me (painfully so) a lot more than the wins over decent teams like Minnesota, Green Bay, San Diego and even Denver when they were 6-1.

This all makes the 2009 season that much more frustrating.

Let’s hope Mike T rights the ship and 2010 is a much different story.


Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:05 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forums/DivisionCore.